So,
continuing on my theme of linking current events to guitar playing
philosophy (no matter how tenuously!) - we're basking in the glow of
frankly astonishing Olympic success while the Paralympic boys and
girls are midway through repeating the feat, showing just how far it
is possible to push the human body. Excellence and achievement is
very much IN – and it's beautiful to see!
So
what does this mean for us guitar players? Well, maybe it's a
generational thing – I learned to play in the mid 90s when guitar
playing was reacting against the perceived excesses of the 80s and
the idea of “too much technique” was in fashion.. Guitar solos
with “too many notes” were sneered at and a generation of guitar
players were raised with the notion of “playing for the song”..
Which, to be fair, is not a bad idea. But it did swing a little too
far- players like Noel Gallagher and John Squire did a fine job
supporting the songs with carefully crafted melodic rhythm parts and
guitar solos, but then pretty much anyone who could string two power
chords together was lauded as the new “anti-hero”. Being good at
your instrument was deemed “uncool” by the music press, and with
it the idea of exploring the potential of the guitar, learning and
understanding technique and theory became viewed as something to
apologise for.
Happily,
as with all fashions, they are fleeting and through the early
Noughties we saw a resurgence in guitar virtuosity, particularly with
the runaway success of unashamed hair metal renegades The Darkness
making solos cool again, and players like Andy McKee and Newton
Faulkner breathed new life into the acoustic guitar, building on the
legacy of underground geniuses like Michael Hedges :
With the
internet giving exposure to bands an artists who might never have had
a chance at being heard in the mainstream, we seem to be hitting a
point where a player like Tosin Abasi is as widely known as Taylor
Swift, and his talent and dedication to his craft can serve as an
inspiration to another generation.
So
the point of all this? There's room for both – if you just want to
chug power chords or view the guitar simply as a tool for writing
songs, fair play to you. But don't underestimate the player who's
chosen to research his or her instrument a little deeper, in order to
find alternate voicings for those chords, create riffs or textural
parts to enhance those songs. And don't assume that just because they
know their scales they're going to widdle tastelessly all over your
prized musical creation – a truly good player understands the tools
at their disposal and uses them according to the situation.
Arpeggios, for example – you can use them to burn like Malmsteen:
or soar like Gilmour:
or soar like Gilmour:
Technique,
then isn't simply the pursuit of being able to play lots of notes
really fast. It's about being able to size up the song and find
exactly the right part to enhance it, whether it's a blistering
face-melter solo or a subtle textural part composed of interesting
alternative chord voicings – and then being able to play that part
well. Consider, for example, “Sweet Child O' Mine” - and imagine
it without the intro. Technique makes it possible to play that part,
and you can't argue that the song would be poorer without it.
Next
post, we'll be discussing how we can apply this approach to theory to
help develop that most elusive of qualities – feel. Till then, keep
pursuing excellence and be proud of it!